Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass After Sleeve Gastrectomy for Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease and or Insufficient Weight-Loss: a Comparative Study.

INTRODUCTION: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is a popular surgical weight-loss procedure, but there are increasing reports of revisional Roux-Y-gastric-bypass (R-RYGB) to manage weight-loss failure (WLF) or proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after SG, with little data available in these settings. METHODS: This retrospective study included all consecutive patients undergoing R-RYGB for WLF or RGERD after SG in two bariatric care centers from 2012 to 2018. RESULTS: Of 720 patients, 46 (3.6%) underwent R-RYGB (RGERD, n = 25; 54.4%; WLF, n = 21; 45.6%) within 44.8 ± 27.5 months post-SG. SG had enabled 27% ± 11.6 total weight loss (TWL) in the RGERD group vs. 7.2% ± 12.5% TWL in the WLF group (p < 0.001). At R-RYGB, WLF-group patients had a higher BMI (47.8 ± 8.4 vs. 34.7 ± 6.1 kg/m2; p < 0.001) and a higher number of comorbidities (2.4 ± 1.5 vs 1.5 ± 1.2; p < 0.02) compared to RGERD-group patients, while severe morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIb) was not significantly different between groups (6.5% vs 2.1%, p = 0.6). %TWL was still higher in the RGERD group at 12 months post-R-RYGB (35.6% ± 10.4 vs. 23.8% ± 9.2; p < 0.01) but not after 24 months post-R-RYGB. R-RYGB corrected reflux symptoms in 32 (94%) patients and reduced PPI use in 29 (97%) patients (p < 0.001), with no significant between-group difference. A history of adjustable gastric banding (AGB) (N = 8;17.4%) prior to SG was associated with a similar prevalence of GERD at R-RYGB and a lower %TWL (AGB:13.1 ± 10.2 vs. No AGB:31.6 ± 8.5; p < 0.05) at 3 years post-R-RYGB. CONCLUSION: R-RYGB following SG provides remission of reflux symptoms in 94% of patients and extra weight loss in patients with WLF, except in patients with a history of AGB prior to SG.

A decade in the battlefield (2004-2014): A French military perspective on the high mortality associated with non-exclusively orthopedic or brain combat injuries.

BACKGROUND: During the last few decades, French armed forces have regularly deployed in asymmetric conflicts. Surgical support for casualties of these conflicts occurs in NATO role 2 and 3 medical treatment facilities (MTF); definitive surgical care occurs in France following a strategic medical evacuation. The aim of this study was to describe the combat injury profile of these soldiers who presented with either non-exclusively orthopedic and/or brain injuries. METHODS: This descriptive study is a retrospective analysis of the surgical management of French casualties performed in role 2 or 3 MTF in Afghanistan, Mali, Niger, Djibouti and the Central African Republic between January 2004 and December 2014. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included. Forty had fragment wounds. The most severe lesions were of the head, neck or thorax. The average injury severity score (ISS) was 34.9 (IC 95% 29.8-40). 17 damage control procedures were performed. Thirty patients died with a mean ISS of 61 (IC 95% 56-67); 5 deaths were considered as preventable. The most frequent surgical procedures in the MTF were digestive (n=31) and thoracic surgery (n=19). Thirty patients needed second-look surgery in France; eleven had severe complications. No patient died following medical evacuation to France. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study indicated that the mortality following non-exclusively brain or orthopedic injuries remains high in modern asymmetric conflicts. Level of Evidence IV.

What are the risk factors of failure of enhanced recovery after right colectomy? Results of a prospective study on 140 consecutive cases.

PURPOSE: Nausea and vomiting is the main cause of failure of enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) after right hemicolectomy. METHODS: From January 2013 to January 2018, all patients undergoing right hemicolectomy were prospectively included. Patients undergoing emergency surgery, additional complex procedure or temporary stoma, nasogastric tube (NGT) maintenance, or abdominal drainage were excluded. Failure of ERP was defined as nausea/vomiting precluding oral feeding after POD3 and/or the occurrence of postoperative ileus requiring NGT and/or length of stay (LOS) ≥ 8 days except for patients awaiting admission in rehabilitation unit. Risk factors of failure of ERP were identified using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Among 306 patients undergoing right hemicolectomy, 140 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Postoperative morbidity was 31%, and the mortality rate was nil. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 7 days (range 2-30). Successful ERP was achieved in 83 patients (59%). Causes of failure were major nausea/vomiting precluding oral feeding after POD3 in 36, postoperative ileus requiring NGT in 16 and LOS ≥ 8 days in 36. On multivariate analysis, preoperative anemia (OR 5.2; CI 95%, 1.3-21.1, p = 0.02) and platelet anti-aggregant/anti-coagulant (OR 4.5; CI 95%, 1.7-12.1, p = 0.003) were associated with the risk of failure of ERP. CONCLUSION: This study shows that anemia and medication with antiplatelet/anticoagulation therapy increase the risk of failure of ERP after right hemicolectomy that translates most of the time by nausea/vomiting and postoperative ileus. The presence of these factors should lead to adapt the strategy to improve outcome rather than be considered as contraindication to ERP.

French civilian surgical expertise still inadequately prepared for mass casualties 3 years after major terror attacks in Paris (2015) and Nice (2016).

BACKGROUND: Three years after the terror attacks in Paris and Nice, this study aims to determine the level of interest, the technical skills and level of surgical activity in exsanguinating trauma care for a nonselected population of practicing French surgeons. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent between July and December 2017 to French students and practicing surgeons, using the French Surgical Colleges' mailing lists. Items analyzed included education, training, interest and clinical activity in trauma care and damage-control surgery (DCS). RESULTS: 622 questionnaires were analyzed and was composed of 318 (51%) certificated surgeons, of whom 56% worked in university teaching hospitals and 47% in Level I trauma centers (TC1); 44% were digestive surgeons and 7% were military surgeons. The mean score of 'interest in trauma care' was 8/10. Factors associated with a higher score were being a resident doctor (p = 0.01), a digestive surgeon (p = 0.0013), in the military (p = 1,71 × 10) and working in TC1 (p = 0.034). The mean "DCS techniques knowledge" score was 6.2/10 and factors significantly associated with a higher score were being a digestive surgeon (respectively, p = 0.0007 and p = 0.001) and in the military (respectively p = 1.74 × 10 and p = 3.94 × 10). Reported clinical activity in trauma and DCS were low. Additional continuing surgical education courses in trauma were completed by 23% of surgeons. CONCLUSION: French surgeons surveyed showed considerable interest in trauma care and treatment. Despite this, and regardless of surgical speciality, their theoretical and practical knowledge of necessary DCS skills remain inadequate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Study Type Survey.